Seriously, this has got to be the most stupidly-argued argument in the history of the edition wars or OSR or whatever.
Not that the debate is without merit…Just that virtually every argument from either side I’ve ever seen is without merit.
-
-
Recent Posts
Tags
- 5E
- AD&D
- aids
- art
- Atlantis
- B/X
- board games
- card games
- cleric
- computer
- design
- dice
- Five Colors
- Forbidden Jungle
- Grid
- history
- hit points
- houserules
- humor
- KAOSE
- KBX
- Kilgore
- kilgore edition
- kilgore edition game
- Kreations
- Labyrinth Lord
- literature
- maps
- movies
- OD&D
- renaissance
- Restenford
- Retainers
- Roll20
- roll to advance
- rules
- session
- spells
- Swords & Wizardry
- thief
- Trav81
- Traveller
- wargames
- Wizards & Warriors
- Wolf Rock
Forums
Games & Publishers
Resources
Pages
Archives
Um…I agree?
Don’t hit me! Don’t hit me!
I can’t even try to hit you. I can’t understand if the plus makes your AC higher or lower, and even if I did, I wouldn’t know if higher or lower was better or worse.
lol
No. You’re wrong. 😉
Oh, F! I laughed so hard!
–Face red with tears in my eyes–laughter.
Cool.
But, CLEARLY, you’re wrong. 😉
No, YOU’RE wrong! 😉
But seriously, it is a stupid argument. Use what you like and damn the “neo-radicals” and “traditionalists” both! 😉
mactavish out.
The correct answer to the question of Ascending AC vs. Descending AC is this:
It doesn’t freaking matter. Flip a coin and pick one, because you’ll waste more time debating it than just using whichever one is “wrong”.
Just wanted to thank you for that. A few guys are very loud…
I posted “I’m tired of this fight, and it’s so silly” and got more hits than I’ve had in a long time.